• News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News
News Channels:
  • CG News
  • 3DS Max
  • Blender
  • After Effects
  • Modo

Spotlight > Realtime

Bender EEVEE tree creature test

Jun 07, 2018 by CGPress Staff
37 |
Tweet

Daniel Bystedt has published a sample video in which he tests Blender 2.8’s EEVEE real-time viewport. The 10 second sequence was rigged and animated in Blender 2.79 and rendered in Blender 2.8. Watch it on YouTube.

Related News

  • EEVEE Next announced for Blender
  • Noara video game trailer – rendered with EEVEE
  • Daniel Bystedt’s short film demonstrates Blender 2.8’s Eevee realtime engine
37 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jumanji
6 years ago

pretty impressive, especially for a free software!

steve gilbert
6 years ago

very impressive, something you’d hope maya, modo and 3ds max might attain someday if they have a development path that wasn’t just ‘buy stuff’ and bug fix it afterward.

andre
Reply to  steve gilbert
6 years ago

except that they don’t really fix the bugs

MauricioPC
Reply to  andre
6 years ago

Well, there’s a ton of bugs in Max/Modo/Maya. I think Houdini is the only one where the company is on top of squashing bugs.

Steve W
Reply to  steve gilbert
6 years ago

EEVEE is coming along quite nice. But every software including Blender has bugs and they’re always fixed afterwards :). And Blender costs money too, just a lot of Blender users are cheap and don’t contribute to the development.

Jonathan
6 years ago

uh…surprisingly more impressive than I thought at first.

Alberto
6 years ago

Blender can’t be ignored any more.
Very exiting.

stephen
6 years ago

that’s just insane. i agree you can’t ignore blender anymore.

slebed
6 years ago

This looks very impressive. I’m really hoping the new UI improvements will let me move into this software easier than its been in the past.

Robert
6 years ago

Impressive!

MauricioPC
6 years ago

It’s only me or you guys can see Juang3D behind his monitor with a evil laugh: “I told you so!”. 🙂

Juang3d
Reply to  MauricioPC
6 years ago

I´ve laughed a lot with your comment 🙂

MauricioPC
Reply to  Juang3d
6 years ago

Just for fun! 🙂

But I’m sure you are proud. The work in Blender is very impressive. Even I supported the Code Quest. Makes you want to support such a nice development.

Waqas
6 years ago

Going back to 3DS MAX viewoprt after watching this is gonna be hard…
Autodesk, if you have any honor, commit seppuku now…DO IT NOW!

pieforme
6 years ago

wow! that bit with the magnifying glass was mental. must download blender cant resist.

Marcin
6 years ago

Looking at this, I guess the question is not anymore ‘How many years until Blender is a valid replacement’ but ‘How many years until that multi-billion company realise they seriously need to invest in developers, research, innovation and stuff users really want to see and ask for since 10 years.

Also, it’s pretty clear that a company developing one application will do things better and really polish the stuff they release, unlike a company which tries to sell 20 different products with quite a lot overlapping functionality.
It’s not about whether 3dsmax/maya will die anymore, it’s getting obvious that it’s more about whether Autodesk will survive in DCC if they keep their slow and uninspired ways.

Honestly, this blew me away. Also, is there a new UI in Blender?

eloi
Reply to  Marcin
6 years ago

This viewport is very impressive, and I will be playing with it as soon as this is out.
Now, being realistic, for my type of job and I guess for a lot other users, anything that is not final rendering is not so relevant, and you simply want to have the fastest playback possible. We have arealights, area shadows, AO in viewport in 3dsmax, and I have everything disabled all the time, because with 2000 assets on screen with pointcaches, with particles, etc… I dont care about having a shadow there, I only want to move it in a fluid way, and I will see the final result as a render.
Obviously I see the potential of this for a lot other users, or even me to test new stuff at home. Simply surprise me how some shines excite more people than improvements on alembic I/O, more robust core, or any improvements on day to day tools (that also blender is doing).

Marcin
Reply to  eloi
6 years ago

Eyecandy is effective because that’s what we are doing on a daily basis – pretty pictures.

Blender’s way is impressive in that it’s free and they keep adding the good stuff constantly. Then again, I’m not using Blender and I’m pretty sure I’d have a lot to complain about if it was my main tool, I’ll give you that.

3dsmax/Maya – as much as I appreciate the teams behind the product, there seems to be the usual problem of bigger companies, they’re simply too big, walk on too many legs, have a crazy management/sales overhead and become ineffective and slow. I guess we would be shocked to see the research-developer vs. management-sales-accounting ratio if these numbers were available. You can watch features being developed and added in super-slow-motion… or not at all.
I’ve learned in recent years is that as a user I get more out of my time if I put it into beta testing of 3rd party plugins instead of the core package. Realizing that was a bit depressing but then again it’s just part of reality – this huge dinosaur of a company is simply unable to walk faster.
And that’s why users of 3dsmax/Maya keep looking at Houdini and Blender and get jealous – it’s simply an entirely different experience compared to how smaller and more specialized companies work.

MauricioPC
Reply to  eloi
6 years ago

That is true. But for that specifically you can have Houdini. For £300 you would have a killer FX software for ultra complex stuff and a free software that allows you to do real-time rendering (depending on the projects), fast modelling and good animation tools.

It’s a hard combo to beat and I’m a Max fanboy.

eloi
Reply to  MauricioPC
6 years ago

300? I dont understand how you do the numbers.

MauricioPC
Reply to  eloi
6 years ago

I’m talking about Houdini Indie, of course. If you do more than 100k as a company, then the cost of 3ds Max + plugins or the full Houdini FX shouldn’t be a problem.

But for a Freelancer, you can have Houdini for $269/year + Blender + maybe Redshift or some other render engine. And you have a full FX pipeline with 4K rendering. In most cases, is more than enough.

But, let’s say you decide to go full Houdini FX. It’s $4.500 the first year and then $2.500 each year for the upgrade.

3ds Max is around $1.500/year + $600/year of TP + $395 of FumeFX (I’ll go rental so it makes more sense). That’s $2.500 each year to keep it current.

So Houdini would cost double the first year, then the same as Max and some basic plugins for the next years. But you own Houdini, you don’t own Max (that might or might not be good). And I’m not adding Krakatoa, which is a must for particle work in Max.

Not saying that this Max combo is a bad idea, but the pricing matches. The only difference is that Houdini has a VERY generous Indie version, something I don’t see Autodesk doing ever.

eloi
Reply to  MauricioPC
6 years ago

You are kind of moving the numbers as you want. The license of Houdini FX “comparable” kind of to 3dsmax is 6995 + 3995 per year to have a none locked license. Quite far away from the cost of 3dsmax. Plus all the tools of krakatoa you will need for FX are free with the demo version, you only need to pay for the point renerer.
But well..I dont know why we move the conversation, here we was talking about blender, And the demo its awesome!

MauricioPC
Reply to  eloi
6 years ago

Hi Eloi,

My bad. I was looking at workstation for artists. For a studio, you are right, the cost is impressively more expensive. So it all depends really. Houdini for a freelancer or single artist is cheaper if Indie, or the same price if Houdini FX. But if you need a floating license, then it’s a lot more expensive.

And again, my bad also. We should be talking about Blender. You are right. 🙂

Have you seen this add-on? I’m finding it very impressive for “simpler” FLIP Fluids.

https://twitter.com/FlipFluids

Equiso
Reply to  eloi
6 years ago

on the other hand, you can load digital assets from houdini fx to houdini core and engine. so only fx guys needs the fx licence. Houdini core anual upgrade is 1500. Just for other guys that are reading : ). Don t know the cost of slave nodes for farm for max thou.

Alberto
Reply to  eloi
6 years ago

Another great Blender point for efficiency, it starts in 1 second.
It’s crazy how this makes your life easier, a crash almost doesn’t matter.

They really seem to do it the right way, they’re already thinking of improving the animation too.
They have focus and a vision.

MauricioPC
Reply to  Alberto
6 years ago

And the performance with high dense meshes in Blender is really more impressive then it was. I remember it was similar to Modo. Now it just blows Modo out of the water.

steve gilbert
6 years ago

Quite hard to dismiss Blender as ‘faff’ these days.
this year i added Blender to my workflow..i import and edit CAD models (.step) into 3dsmax, clean up and export to blender to render in cycles on GPU for product shots and short animations for clients.

Autodesk sealed their fate with me as a long term customer (started with max 2.5 in 1999) by adding 20% year on year for subs to pressure you to go rental…so i dropped max subs and moved my rendering to Blender. Autodesk really have crap management…i guess they factored in many will walk away for bully boy tactics but they just don’t care.

Once i find a good .step importer for a non auto-rental app i can move away completely.

Blender is on the rise

Equiso
Reply to  steve gilbert
6 years ago

https://www.foundry.com/products/modo/addons/power-translators

Maybe that interest you. Bit expensive thou. Nevertheless, then you can use gltf to export/import. Blender don’t like fbx that much.

steve gilbert
Reply to  Equiso
6 years ago

i use fbx all the time with blender..not an issue

Equiso
Reply to  Equiso
6 years ago

I had bad experiences with rigs on the past. If it’s only mesh, uvs, vertex colors and material assigments usually its fine.

RoH
Reply to  steve gilbert
6 years ago

Have you tested https://www.freecadweb.org/?
It is not an importer, but if you go indirectly from max to blender anyway, this could be an option for you.
Best regards
RoH

Eric Smith
6 years ago

YES. If Blender had a better outliner for selecting / viewing listed items within nested groups I would start diving into it. The automotive CAD files (delivered to us in Maya often) we use are very difficult to work with in Blender due to this shortcoming. Viewport performance, however even with the large CAD files is solid.

Juang3d
Reply to  Eric Smith
6 years ago

You mean like the new “Collections” of Blender 2.8? 😉

Trono
6 years ago

It’s great having a free software pushing boundaries, and hopefully keeping the big developers on their toes. Nothing is better for us consumers than proper competition between software houses – especially having a free option getting attention. Wishing Blender the best of luck here!
That being said this is no doubt a simple scene and setup. Made to look amazing, so I’m not being carried away just yet. It has its limited use. For students and indie artists working on shorts etc. this could be a great tool though!

Juang3d
Reply to  Trono
6 years ago

You know this is just the viewport, right? Is the only thing being shown here, Cycles on the other hand is the proper render engine 🙂

Trono
Reply to  Juang3d
6 years ago

Oh indeed, I know. I’m more pointing out that this scene is a simple setup with an image backdrop. I’m assuming if you go for a more typical production scene things will drastically slow down – and you’ll end up turning all the viewport features off.

Still, it does look good! My experience is just that unless you’re actually working in a game/real-time pipeline (low-poly, baking textures and so on) real-time visual features tend to bog you down more than it helps.

I’d be happy to be proven wrong though 😉

Juang3d
Reply to  Trono
6 years ago

I think so, at least with some features, but this is really helpful for Look & Dev because materials and lights are treated in a pretty similar way than how the render engine treats them, so you can configure your materials and your lighting in Eevee and after that render it and get the expected results, usually you are not able to do that in any other package because viewport “candy” is not represented in the same way by the render engine, so all the bells and whistles are there not besucase it´s beautiful, but because it´s useful 🙂

Now… for animation or modeling work you have an specific mode called workbench with a lot of features designed to speed up workflow and viewport performance.

So far, up until today, Blender 2.8 with Eevee enabled with everything is as fast as Blender 2.79 plain viewport (wich was already pretty neat, except when you edit a mesh with millions of polygons, note that I say Edit, not sculpt 🙂 ) and so far it has not been optimized, so it seems that once it is optimized it would be several times faster than 2.79 viewport with everything enabled… so you can imagine there will also be another improvement with everything disabled 🙂

Cheers!

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Comments

  • G_L on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026
  • G_L on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026
  • Senorpablo on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026
  • Guest (the original) on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026
  • G_L on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026
  • G_L on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026
  • Senorpablo on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026
  • SL92 on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026

Latest Features

1

Review of the Huion Kamvas 13 Pen Display for 3D artists

6

Archvis artists – what the hell do they do?

See All CGPress Features

Follow CGPress

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Copyright ©2000-2025 CGPress. All rights reserved.

About Us | Contact Us | Contribute News | Advertise
facebook
twitter
rss
wpDiscuz
Manage Cookie Consent

CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data. 

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}