CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Double Negative said what we already know. The problem with substance designer is that there is still no UDIM and full python API support. So this is not the best tool for film production pipelines (like Mari or Substance Painter). It is a great tool but mainly for game development. However, it has all the potential to be like so, because of its procedural nature it could be very productive in the future for mass iterations in films. At least it can now export to 8k.
yeah, a year and a half ago I asked them when they were going to implement UDIM support. They said “in a few months”. Then they implemented this half-assed UDIM support that’s not really what you want to have. You cannot paint across different UV spaces on a same mesh, which is what you actually want UDIMS for!
Anyways, still a nice tool especially for the price, but the usability of the interface should be improved. They certainly need some UX designer there.
Hm, from what I know, Substance Designer has not UDIM support at all. Only Substance Painter has partly implemented UDIM, as you said.