CGPress
  • News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News
  • News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News
No Result
View All Result
CGPress
Home Software Blender
Blender 2.80 release candidate available

Blender 2.80 release candidate available

by Paul Roberts
July 11, 2019
Reading Time: 1 min read
24

The Blender Foundation has released a release candidate for Blender 2.80, meaning the final release is imminent. Assuming all things go well, this should be the final shipping version, or certainly close to it, You can download it from here and see the most recent Blender Today live stream on YouTube. 

RELATED POSTS

Bolt Graphics becomes corporate patron of Blender Development Fund

Ton Roosendaal to step down as Blender Foundation CEO

Blender Foundation reports higher donations but warns of low reserves in 2024 annual report

ShareTweet

Paul Roberts

Paul is the owner and editor of CGPress, an independent news website built by and for CG artists. With more than 25 years in the business, we are one of the longest-running CG news organizations in the world. Our news reporting has gathered a reputation for credibility, independent coverage and focus on quality journalism.

Related Posts

Bolt Graphics becomes corporate patron of Blender Development Fund
Blender

Bolt Graphics becomes corporate patron of Blender Development Fund

September 18, 2025
Blender 2.79 test build now available
Blender

Ton Roosendaal to step down as Blender Foundation CEO

September 17, 2025
Blender Foundation reports higher donations but warns of low reserves in 2024 annual report
Blender

Blender Foundation reports higher donations but warns of low reserves in 2024 annual report

September 16, 2025
Anym introduces physics-based animation engine for sparse keyframing in Maya, Blender and C4D
Blender

Anym introduces physics-based animation engine for sparse keyframing in Maya, Blender and C4D

September 10, 2025
Blender 4.1 introduces performance enhancements and new features
Blender

Blender 4.1 introduces performance enhancements and new features

March 28, 2024
Adobe releases Substance 3D Addon 2.0 for Blender
Add-ons

Adobe releases Substance 3D Addon 2.0 for Blender

March 1, 2024
Next Post
Chaos – spline plugin for 3DS Max

Chaos - spline plugin for 3DS Max

DNEG’s Catch 22 breakdown

DNEG's Catch 22 breakdown

Please read our community guidelines
Please read our community guidelines
24 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Juang3d
6 years ago

It was planned for today, but the release has not been done yet, probably tomorrow or next monday 🙂

Reply
Guest
Reply to  Juang3d
6 years ago

As much as I would like to make blender my main 3d tool I still think it is suffering from that horrible decision made years ago to keep the UI as it was or base the new developments on it. while it has been greatly improved since then in functionality it is yet very much “alien” when it comes to trying to use it when jumping back and forth between apps or for newcomers from other major 3d software like Max.

I wish it wasn’t so but for my team and I this has still been painful to transition to even after 2 years of having it installed in the background. Which is why we still use Blender for limited things here and there but not for any production work yet.

Reply
Fabio
Reply to  Guest
6 years ago

I learned to model on 3ds max and used for 3 years, then went to Maya and stayed there for double the time. Some years ago I switched to Blender and can’t get back to Maya or Max, they’re too old and don’t work very well for me anymore, it’s the same software year after year. Give another chance to Blender, you don’t like it yet because you were no commited to it. If Blender was the standard one, then Max would have the alien interface, it’s all relative.

Reply
Wool
Reply to  Guest
6 years ago

One big improvement I’m hoping for since ages (maybe it happened in v2.8, Juang3d ?): fixing the hover-tips ! When I hover over a button, UI-element or menu-element, I don’t need and don’t want any cryptic “python-paths”. That’s confusing me, and not helpful (at least not when starting to use Blender). Helpful instead would be if the hover-tips would provide a short info about the tool/button AND: the current keyboard-shortcut assigned to it. This way new users or switchers like me would have needed information right under the cursor, and would learn the keyboard-shortcuts (which still play a quite huge role in Blender).

Reply
Juang3d
Reply to  Wool
6 years ago

Those python paths are important when you are an advanced Blender user 🙂 because you do “small scripts” really fast to do repetitive tasks, on the other hand, yes, in the tooltips you find the description and the shortcut if it has one, but you find another important thing (that not always work, specially in 2.80 since the documentation is not finished) a link to the manual with the full explanation.

Also in the settings, in the “interface” section, inside the “Display” options, you will find two checkboxes, “Tooltips” and “Python Tooltips”, you can disable the second one and you will stop seeing those python paths 🙂

Cheers!

Reply
Jovc
Reply to  Guest
6 years ago

You should check out the website; there’s clearly an interface overhaul.
http://www.blender.org/download/releases/2-80/

Reply
Juang3d
Reply to  Guest
6 years ago

Yes, if you try to go forth and back you will find it hard to start with Blender because the philosophy of Blender is completely different than the one in Max/Maya, the UI and the way of work is different.

In 2.80 you will find some things that will ease your forth and back effort, specially the “left click select”, “right click context menu” and the “industry standard” keymap, but even when I was more than 16 years working with max and left click select I have to say that once I got used to right click select it turned to be my preferred selection methos, it’s a matter of personal opinion, but I fully embraced it and it’s great, my hand suffer way less, back in the day with LMB I had some pain in the hand, the “claw” sensation were my hand was suffering from continuous effort in the same group of muscles, since I shifted to Blender this pain disappeared because of the RMB, so the movements are not so repetitive and now I use more muscles in my hand.

Now you have to think that it’s not “alien”, it’s a different software that has a different view of the way of working, if you want to fully leverage it and use it you should use it as it was designed, I’m sure some of you tried to make the UI and shortcuts to be similar to max/maya, I think that’s a bad idea because it was not designed that way, now the LMB selection mode and the “Industry Standard” keymap is more designed towards that, but it has been a long way until that keymap and until the LMB selection mode were really ready to be used, and they still need some polish.

My advice if you really want to learn and leverage Blender is that you should force yourself and your team to FULLY complete a project with Blender, find solutions to all the problems you encounter in the way, don’t fall back to max or maya for anything, don’t worry you will be able to do everything, but if you fall back to max or maya you will never learn how to properly do it in Blender, no need to be a client project, you may do this with an in-house project, something to test this, but force yourselves to do a project in Blender completely, it’s the only way you will really learn Blender (or any other packages that you really want to learn IMHO)

I hope you enjoy 2.80 once it’s released 🙂

Reply
Artur
Reply to  Guest
6 years ago

It is not. I also was prejudiced to Blender a while ago in the very same aspect as you, but actually found both the UI, the workflow, and the selection modes more natural, fluent and pleasing. Really. Blender does have its shortages, main being poor instancing workflow and lack of some vital production capabilities (like OpenVDB, hacky Alembic), but currently it is a fully professional 3D animation package.

Reply
Greg
6 years ago

My main problem with Blender is the performance,
right click selection is bad, the annoying target on the viewport is awful, UI needs to improve, but the worst of all and the main reason I don’t use Blender is that every time I try to do something with a few hundred thousands of polys the performance drops like crazy, is even worse than Maya, which has a really bad performace.

Reply
Mandrake0
Reply to  Greg
6 years ago

that’s why 2.8 has a new interface, viewport has been updated and a lot of fixes have been done. blender is not maya as maya is not blender every tool has is pro’s and con’s. for a tool that is free to use it’s quiet good.

Reply
BlenderUser
Reply to  Greg
6 years ago

Global Undo is the most likely culprit as it pretty much saves the state of whole scene which gets very slow with big scenes. Disable it (use Local) and you can work with 50+mil poly scenes with pretty average hardware (M2 drive wont hurt either). Infact upon exporting to max/maya they are the slow ones at least when it comes to modeling (though anim playback in Maya is superb!). Downside is that you pretty much have to learn never to press CTRL+Z unless in Edit/Sculpt or any other Local Undo mode. Obviously it’s a very bad solution. This issue needs to be addressed for professional use. Other than that the guys did amazing job! I have switched several years ago to Blender/Houdini from decades of Max/Maya. I’d have to be subjected to some serious torture to consider returning to either of these stagnated dinosaurs. Read that as warm recommendation not to dismiss it, but to give it a serious try.

Reply
Juang3d
Reply to  BlenderUser
6 years ago

Totally true, and that is why this problem is being discussed in the devtlak forum here, more people chiming in, the sooner it will be fixed 🙂

https://devtalk.blender.org/t/blender-2-8-undo-improvements-it-last-45-seconds-to-undo-an-object-movement-in-a-big-scene/2554

Reply
Mandrake0
Reply to  Juang3d
6 years ago

Not everything is perfect in blender but we compair here a tool that is developed by a small team vs maya where the total dev teamsize for version 1.0 was upto 120 people!

For the undo system make a fundraise with a solid proposal how it should be fixed.

Reply
Juang3d
Reply to  Mandrake0
6 years ago

For this specific fix there is no need to make a fundraiser, as I said, it’s being discussed in the devtalk forum, and it will be solved sooner than later, the solution for this is not obvious because it’s a matter of internal design, something very complex, but making the problem more visible will help to get it fixed sooner, I hope we see something for 2.81 or 2.82.

What will help in general is to subscribe to the Blender Development Fund or to the Blender Cloud:

https://fund.blender.org/

https://cloud.blender.org/

Keep in mind that once 2.80 is released (in about 2 weeks I think they said) we will go back to the normal Blender release Cycles, this is a 2.8x version every 3/4 months, with new features, daily builds will continue to be available with continuous bug fixing and new features, but with somewhat a bit more inestable of course, and anyone will be able to continue building their own Blender version, like us, we have our own version with some Cycles optimizations and speed-ups and some new modifiers like an OpenVDB remesher with CSG operations and an OpenVDB mes her for particles, you can find different versions and branches here:

https://blender.community/c/graphicall

Cheers.

Reply
Eric Smith
Reply to  Juang3d
6 years ago

And with the new $1.2 million grant, they should be able to hire 3-4 more full-time developers for three years?

Reply
Jay
Reply to  Greg
6 years ago

You don’t have to use right click anymore. I was a maya guy then a max guy and now a blender guy. Yes i do feel what your saying but thats all gone now. Ive been with 2.8 since the start of the beta and i can say i will never go back to max or maya. As far as performance blender has great performance the only thing you have to watch out if you apply a sub d modifier and you crank it way to high then your going to hit a bump in performance. Other then that its one of the best packages out there.

Reply
Alexey Vanzhula
6 years ago

Blender 2.8 has amazing VP. But try to select vertices in >300k polys model and move it with G key. Try this in Houdini and you will understand their differences. Houdini is much faster and you can interact with model very well. Why it so?

Reply
MauricioPC
Reply to  Alexey Vanzhula
6 years ago

The same happens in Modo to be honest from my testings. A bit better in Maya and Max is the champion.

But why would you move everything as a vertice? From what I hear from my modelling friends, they hardly make a 300k vertex selection on a character to move it around.

Reply
Alexey Vanzhula
Reply to  MauricioPC
6 years ago

I’m a developer and use Houdini as backend for modeling tools. Houdini used to slow interaction, but not for now.

My tests:

Slow highpoly selection and interaction:
1. Maya
2. Blender
3. Modo
4. 3dsMax
5. Silo
6. LW

Fast highpoly selection and interaction:
1. XSI
2. Houdini

Reply
MauricioPC
Reply to  Alexey Vanzhula
6 years ago

Oh yes… Softimage. Autodesk, shame on you! Used to love playing with that software.

Reply
Juang3d
Reply to  Alexey Vanzhula
6 years ago

Exactly, the only software I tested that was fast modifying high poly meshes was Softimage (and maybe Houdini now, I have not tested it recently), I suspect this will improve in Blender sooner than later, but I can’s say anything for sure for the time being 🙂

In any case, that is only in Edit Mode, in Sculpt Mode you can move geometry around without trouble, 300k polys are nothing for that mode.

Reply
IlyaK
Reply to  Alexey Vanzhula
6 years ago

damn, how can I keep living now that I’ve realized I can’t responsively move around 300K polygons? I should prolly ditch Blender immediately despite the fact that it has now gotten a full-fledged PBR environment and loads of production features across the board that all make B3D dope.

Reply
Alexey Vanzhula
Reply to  IlyaK
6 years ago

No. This is just about one part of Blender that can be improved in future. PBR is amazing….

Reply
Juang3d
Reply to  Alexey Vanzhula
6 years ago

To answer the question (that I just realized was there “Why it so?” hahaha )

It’s a matter of geometry management, if you go to sculpt mode you will see that you can move geometry around without trouble, in Edit Mode the technique is not the same, I wish we can have a new system underneath to deal with goemetry in edit mode that is as fast as the one in sculpt mode, it will improve, that’s for sure, and that’s what was made inside Softimage with its Gigapolygon Core, and I suspect something similar has been done in Houdini.
The easiest thing that comes to my mind is that they treated the geometry as patches (it’s a bit of a simplification of the technique, but good to explain it) so they “iterate” just over the vertices inside the defined patch, that way the loop over the amount of data is way smaller hence way faster, something like that it’s done in the sculpt mode already, I hope this can be translated to Edit Mode sooner than later (or something similar)

Reply

Recent Comments

  • paul on Miauu releases Layer Colorizer for 3ds Max
  • Jumanji on RenderMan 27 beta released
  • Animatect on Autodesk pitches AI future for media and entertainment at AU 2025
  • Jumanji on SceneLinter Pro: free scene validation script for 3ds Max
  • nomad on Anym introduces physics-based animation engine for sparse keyframing in Maya, Blender and C4D

Popular Stories

  • Adobe faces lawsuit over clarity of subscription and cancellation terms

    Adobe faces lawsuit over clarity of subscription and cancellation terms

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Autodesk pitches AI future for media and entertainment at AU 2025

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • OpenHDRI launches free CC0 library

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Aviz Studio Tools introduces AI image generation tool AImagine for 3ds Max

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 3ds Max 2024 now available for download

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter
CGPress

CGPress is an independent news website built by and for CG artists. With more than 15 years in the business, we are one of the longest-running CG news organizations in the world. Our news reporting has gathered a reputation for credibility, independent coverage and focus on quality journalism. Our feature articles are known for their in-depth analyses and impact on the CG scene. “5 out of 5 artists recommend it.”

Recent Posts

  • Epic Games releases Twinmotion 2025.2 with Nanite support
  • Miauu releases Layer Colorizer for 3ds Max
  • Topaz Labs ends perpetual licenses with launch of Topaz Studio subscription
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy (UK)
  • Contact Us
  • Contribute News
  • Advertise on CGPress

© 2025 CGPress

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Manage Cookie Consent

CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data. 

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News

© 2025 CGPress

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
wpDiscuz
24
0
Join the conversationx
()
x
| Reply