CGPress
  • News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News
  • News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News
No Result
View All Result
CGPress
Home Articles

PhysX versus Bullet performance

by Tobbe Olsson
March 26, 2014
Reading Time: 1 min read
7

A hot topic of discussion when it comes to physics engines is often which is faster and more stable, PhysX or Bullet. A post on PhysXinfo claims that PhysX has been faster than Bullet for quite some time. According to Pierre Terdiman, senior software engineer at NVIDIA:

RELATED POSTS

How AI is turning creative software into a metered utility

Porting MaxPlus to pymxs

Befores and Afters interviews Weta about the future of its tools following the Unity acquisition

“The point is simply, again, that contrary to what people may still believe, PhysX is actually very optimized and a perfectly fine CPU physics engine. In fact, if some competitors would not prevent me from publishing the results, I would happily show you that it often beats everybody else.

I invite curious readers to create their own benchmarks and see for themselves.”

Of course, given the source of the information it would definitely be wise to run tests for yourself if you are truly interested in which is faster than the other. The current version of PhysX that’s implemented into MassFX is 2.8.4. To read the full 12 page article, go to PhysXinfo’s website.

ShareTweet

Tobbe Olsson

Related Posts

How AI is turning creative software into a metered utility
Articles

How AI is turning creative software into a metered utility

November 5, 2025
Porting MaxPlus to pymxs
3DS Max

Porting MaxPlus to pymxs

June 13, 2023
Befores and Afters interviews Weta about the future of its tools following the Unity acquisition
Articles

Befores and Afters interviews Weta about the future of its tools following the Unity acquisition

February 17, 2023
PBR – From Rules to Measurements
Articles

PBR – From Rules to Measurements

September 9, 2022
Autodesk’s culture code
Articles

Autodesk’s culture code

October 25, 2021
Understanding how UE5’s Nanite actually works
Articles

Understanding how UE5’s Nanite actually works

June 3, 2021
Next Post

Monotone Minimal releases VFB+ 2.3

Autodesk is looking for speakers for Autodesk University 2013

Please read our community guidelines
Please read our community guidelines
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JohnnyRandom
12 years ago

What I don’t understand is PhysX 3.x has been out for a number of years and max is still using 2.8.x. There are not only large speed improvements but a ton of other features as well.

Then we wait…and wait…and wait…

Reply
Anselm von Seherr-Thoss
12 years ago

Late to the game as so very often…

Reply
Steve Green
12 years ago

I’m sure if Arch-viz users had a need you’d see it implemented a lot quicker.

Reply
nickolay411
12 years ago

Its interesting because in Max 2012 If you go into the PhysX tools engine tab. You can switch the engine from 2.x to 3.x

But in 2013 the option has been removed. Not sure if it was ever supported?

Reply
Tobbe Olsson
Author
12 years ago

Yeah, although it’s difficult to know what goes on behind the scenes. Perhaps NVIDIA hiked up the prices too much for 3.x, who knows? I doubt developers at Autodesk “wants” to use an old version. But I don’t really get Autodesk’s thinking these days. Used to be innovation but I feel they’ve stagnated a bit. Each step feels like a minor evolution and they leave most of the really innovative stuff to companies like Thinkbox. Physics wise I am still really curious what they are going to do with the Naiad tech and the developers behind that…

Reply
John
12 years ago

It is still there. You must have mixed the Nvidia version and Autodesk’s MassFX version.

In Nvidia’s version you can switch between 2.x and 3.x. Autodesk’s versions not

Reply
brandon young
12 years ago

no fan boy of either, but bullet often doesnt deliver.

Reply

Recent Comments

  • Rawalanche on Blender 5.0 released
  • d3d on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026.3
  • Damm on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026.3
  • Stephen Lebed on Blender 5.0 released
  • d3d on Blender 5.0 released

Popular Stories

  • Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026.3

    Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026.3

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 3ds Max 2024 now available for download

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Blender 5.0 released

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Canva reimagines Affinity Studio and releases it free to all users

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Unreal Engine 5.7 Preview released with new procedural and material tools

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Facebook Twitter
CGPress

CGPress is an independent news website built by and for CG artists. With more than 15 years in the business, we are one of the longest-running CG news organizations in the world. Our news reporting has gathered a reputation for credibility, independent coverage and focus on quality journalism. Our feature articles are known for their in-depth analyses and impact on the CG scene. “5 out of 5 artists recommend it.”

Recent Posts

  • RealityScan 2.1 released
  • Keyshot 2025.3 Released
  • Silo adds Blender bridge
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy (UK)
  • Contact Us
  • Contribute News
  • Advertise on CGPress

© 2025 CGPress

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Manage Cookie Consent

CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data. 

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News

© 2025 CGPress

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
wpDiscuz
7
0
Join the conversationx
()
x
| Reply