“This is the horrible reality of current-generation [stereoscopic] 3D. People cheer when you turn it off.” Read the article by Mike Elgan at DigitalArts.com.
“This is the horrible reality of current-generation [stereoscopic] 3D. People cheer when you turn it off.” Read the article by Mike Elgan at DigitalArts.com.
CGPress is an independent news website built by and for CG artists. With more than 15 years in the business, we are one of the longest-running CG news organizations in the world. Our news reporting has gathered a reputation for credibility, independent coverage and focus on quality journalism. Our feature articles are known for their in-depth analyses and impact on the CG scene. “5 out of 5 artists recommend it.”
© 2025 CGPress
CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data.
HAHA! Op-Ed Fail 🙂 This is a fun read after Avatar becomes the first movie to reach a billion dollars box in just 17 days — and to read that people are seeing it multiple times 🙂 The story is lame, the characters are one dimensional, and the (3d stereoscopic) technology is incredible — what could the appeal of this movie be? hahaha…
You know, that’s all down to personal taste. And I think you will find that not that many people share your opinion 🙂 Everyone I know has seen the film because they found the story fantastic, much like the way the Lord Of The Rings films did a couple of years ago. After all, this is a classic cowboys and indians story, but elegantly adapted and reinvented into a sci-fi setting. It would be naive to expect something totally radical and groundbreaking at that budget – after all, they have to make that money back somehow. And myself, I would gladly see it again, 3D or not. Most likely not in 3D.
The article doesn’t say that stereoscopic 3D won’t succeed as a novelty at first, but that ppl will get tired of it quickly, at least in its current state. Maybe it will fail in 2010, maybe in 2011. 🙂 Here’s a few more recent links on the subject:
Do Consumers Really Want 3-D TVs?
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/do-consumers-really-want-3d-tvs/
Games industry unenthusiastic about 3D
http://www.digitalartsonline.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=13424
HoloAD, a new 3D display without the glasses – the loops played remind of Edison’s early film loops
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bvoo33pNJJk