CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
i actually think these are photoshopped..not real.
i think they printed the sculptures and photoshopped them onto the ant head, hair and inside the needle as a size reference. the sculpture on the ant head is not affected by the DOF or the hair… not the best photoshop job 😉
it would probably be too hard to actually 3d print something onto a hair (yet).
never the less very impressive that 3d printing at this size is possible. i’m sure there is some sort of medical use.
@cresshead I concur, there is an evident pixel density disparity from the ESM and “3d print” of the figure.