Todd Sheridan Perry reviews Max 9 for Digital Producer : "… unless you are upgrading your workstations to Windows 64 or Windows Vista, you can probably hold out for a point upgrade."
Todd Sheridan Perry reviews Max 9 for Digital Producer : "… unless you are upgrading your workstations to Windows 64 or Windows Vista, you can probably hold out for a point upgrade."
CGPress is an independent news website built by and for CG artists. With more than 15 years in the business, we are one of the longest-running CG news organizations in the world. Our news reporting has gathered a reputation for credibility, independent coverage and focus on quality journalism. Our feature articles are known for their in-depth analyses and impact on the CG scene. “5 out of 5 artists recommend it.”
© 2025 CGPress
CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data.
Quite a negative review for a cool upgrade. I don’t agree at all. Did you notice the drastical speed improvements, the bitmap proxies ……….?
He didn’t even know that Max Hair and Fur is based on, and has always been based on, Joe Alter’s Shave and a Haircut. Also, he had no idea that the new Point Cache system allows data to be transfered between Max 9 and Maya 8. To me it seemed like a very uninformed review.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. It’s generally based on what features are important to you, if you’re an animator, for example, and most of the new tools revolve around animation for a release, you’ll be happy. If you’re a modeling person, or a lighting / rendering person, then you’ll not like the release. For me, Max9 has no new tools I want or need. But I’m very happy if the new features inside max9 help anyone else out.