CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
When is Adobe after effects ever going to get a proper fast EXR implementation I wonder.
Adobe is that reflection Autodesk sees when it looks in the mirror.
The question is if Adobe must do this. Apparently, there is not enough interest in this technology and important VFX companies do not have demands for it.
For the last 3 Years, Exr-IO is running all over the world – and we have NOT received a SINGLE email request to do it for Adobe AfterEffects. Not even a mention about it.
One reason is that there is already a solution for EXRs in AE (ProExr – Brandon did a great job and build in even Cryptomatte).
Other reason may be that it is simply not important. I have spent weeks doing research on Youtube about AE and compositing with different channels, methods, etc – 99% of the content is motion design, fancy particular or trapcode stuff or masking out existing wedding or corporate footages. 99,99% do not even know what Exr is and have no idea how and why to use it.
There are 10-20 (mostly outdated) tutorials about Exr – and nobody else asks for it. Therefore any further development for AE was dropped – from our perspective, in medium terms, it does not lead anywhere.
Conclusion: I think the biggest part of AE user base production has not yet reached the critical mass for the full Exr engagement. Exr is complex, heavy and must be carefully dealt with. Artist use at the moment AfterEffects something else. Let some time pass, till it get more popular 🙂
i wait since day one for it! :(… i think it wos the other way around … long time ago their was no Nuke at all (it was a inhouse software of digital domain until 2008) …But because Adobe didn’t realised to provide a popper 3D compositing environment (i think its old core is not realy designed for it) people and vfx companies had to switch to Nuke (that suddenly appeared because of the unexpacted leak of Apple Shake in 2008) over the last years.
But! in 2019 also motion graphics tools need to have a modern 3D environment and I realy think also Adobe has now (10 years too late) understood that problem and invests now heavyly in 3D technology/companys.
So i’m pretty sure that we will see at least in two years something new inside of AE.