• News
    • General
    • Software
    • Industry
    • Video Games
    • Tech
    • Hardware
  • Articles
    • General
    • Reviews
    • Interviews
  • Tutorials
    • By subject
    • By software
    • Training & Courses
  • Resources
  • Spotlight
    • Reels
    • Films
    • Film Trailers
    • Game Trailers and Art
    • Breakdowns
    • Making Ofs
    • Music Videos
    • CG Videos
    • Images
    • Spots
  • Contribute News
News Channels:
  • CG News
  • 3DS Max
  • Blender
  • After Effects
  • Modo

Software > 3DS Max > Max News

Max on Macs?

Jun 24, 2011 by Dave Baker
14 |
Tweet
Judging by the latest job description on the Autodesk Careers site, it would seem that a port to OS X is finally being taken seriously. One of the job requirements is “Experience with developing for the Mac”. I did some checking before posting this, and instead of pulling people off of the (not very large) Max development team, they are apparently actively looking for people with Mac programming experience to get things moving. It’ll be interesting to see how this pans out, and what the resonance among the users will be.

Related News

  • Jobs: Autodesk is looking for a 3ds Max QA Analyst
  • Cinema 4D to be compatible with Apple Silicon M1 macs
  • Universal Scene Description: open source at Autodesk
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
othoap
14 years ago

I see max’s dedication to one os as a major strength. I’m sad to see any resources pulled away from the core.

Mat
14 years ago

Those job posts are often written by naive human resource personal who lack any technical knowledge. So I wouldn’t read to much into a single line of text that was likely copy/pasted from a template the person uses for posting jobs.

If you were looking for someone to port existing source code to the Mac platform, then you’d be looking for someone with XCode or OSX experience and you wouldn’t state .NET as a important requirement.

Autodesk has painted themself into a corner for years when it comes to making 3ds Max portable to another platform. I can’t picture an OSX developer even wanting to work with a team that is mainly made up of .NET developers.

MU
14 years ago

I would have preferred to see a Linux version first, but hey, I’m sure this move will make many people happy. 🙂

Dave Baker
14 years ago

Like I said in the post, I did some research on this and didn’t just assume everything because of this one line in the job post. It seems like the Max port is going ahead, and so that they don’t need to pull any resources from the Max team, they are hiring people with OSX experience…

Paco Navarro
14 years ago

I think is great, I coincide a Linux version would be more interesting, but not having to re-boot my MacBookPro on Win7 will be VERY nice.

Steve Green
14 years ago

I’ve never been that fussed about a Mac release, but I’d much rather the focus be on getting XBR done and dusted and the neglected features addressed first.

Presumably this is chasing the CAD market again.

Ron Martin
14 years ago

If you want an outdated, overprized and inflexible PC – go out and buy a Mac.

I also would prefer Autodesk focusing on XBR and the overall featureset. Especially a unified and comprehensive mental ray connection and licensing is long time overdue.

me
14 years ago

The problem is you get more issues with it: Slower Graphics because of slow graphics hardware AND Drivers on MAC, Missing features because of missing tools like Nvidia PhysX and much more. This all cost money and WE Windows users have to pay for it, because this money could also go in better products. Have a look at the 2012 release, full of bugs even after the SP1, Nitrous is half baken, Havok missing with stuff like rope sim, water sim, cloth sim and much more. And now you want to use OUR money and spend it in a side branch we don´t even use instead of fixing this ???? I can´t belive it, my disappointment with Autodesk grows and grows, I just hope blender will fill this gap one day and then you will see no money from me again.

othoap
14 years ago

Sure it starts out as just a port. But over time compromises will be made to both sides diluting the original. What about all the other support issues that come along with a second os? That money should be focused on XBR instead.

What’s the market share for Max on OSX? As an example what’s the numbers of Maya on Win to Maya on OSX? How many Max OSX seats could AD sell?

Igor Posavec
14 years ago

either autodesk has unlimited resources so they develop Mac Version on the fly, or they just want to look “sexy” and create some CodeWarriror App for Ipad (there was Maya for Iphone or something like that, i still remember the news about this useless toy).
We did a test and ported from the start Unwrella for both max and maya – it is by all means no measure or example of software to compare anything – but the numbers are 100 sold licenses of max for one maya (mostly Maya educational). Imagine the aspect ratio Max for PC and Max on Mac: this will be 1:10000 probably – against Apple… why this investment?

Jeffrey Carpay
14 years ago

I don’t think this is about a Mac port, but more about running Max in an Mac environment running Bootcamp or Parallels, which Max does already… http://download.autodesk.com/us/3dsmax/documentation/3ds_Max_FAQ.pdf
Since Max is really windows centric programmed (DirectX, .NET framework), I don’t see Max being ported natively to the Mac ever.

othoap
14 years ago

How would a max OSX port effect max plugins and scripts? This is why I left apple for the ms world. I was tired of waiting for hand me down ports.

It amazes me that someone would want to run max with in a emulated OS mode. There must be some tool set in max that people want in there pipeline that other mac native 3d software doesn’t fill. I could not imagine doing a serious project in emulated mode. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.

3DMark
14 years ago

XBR has nothing specific to do with windows or not.
One of the top 5 requests over the years has been a Mac version.

XBR in the long run means a complete re-write of 3ds Max.
Re-writing means that you can write something with all platforms in mind.

OGS/Nitrous/Viewport 2.0 means portable graphics: OpenGL on Mac or Linux, DirectX on Windows. In the end the graphics display should get faster with newer versions.

One of 3ds Max’s strengths is it’s modularity; you can completely remove and/or replace portions of 3ds Max that you choose to. If the file loader or animation controller are not multi-threaded enough for your purposes you can write your own. This is not so for many other competitive products.

As for Blender, I would suggest that you go and use it!
Be a pioneer, Autodesk needs the competition to continue to innovate.

ravihara weerathunge
14 years ago

My opinion is that users need Max on Linux than in Mac OS. By the way, both windows and mac are commercial operating systems and I see no need of porting 3ds max in to mac.

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Comments

  • Artur Mandas on V-Ray now officially available for Blender
  • Jumanji on V-Ray now officially available for Blender
  • slebed on V-Ray now officially available for Blender
  • Dan on V-Ray now officially available for Blender
  • CGPress Staff on V-Ray now officially available for Blender
  • JokerMartini on V-Ray now officially available for Blender
  • Nossgrr on Autodesk releases 3ds Max 2026.1 with a new Attribute Transfer modifier
  • mohinder on V-Ray now officially available for Blender

Latest Features

1

Review of the Huion Kamvas 13 Pen Display for 3D artists

6

Archvis artists – what the hell do they do?

See All CGPress Features

Follow CGPress

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Copyright ©2000-2025 CGPress. All rights reserved.

About Us | Contact Us | Contribute News | Advertise
facebook
twitter
rss
Manage Cookie Consent

CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data. 

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
wpDiscuz