Randi Altman interviews Asylum VFX owner Nathan McGuinness for Post Magazine on the recent closing of the Santa Monica-based studio: “[We] could not compete with the tax incentives and the visual effects companies around the world.”
Nathan McGuinness on the closing of Asylum VFX
Popular Stories
CGPress is an independent news website built by and for CG artists. With more than 15 years in the business, we are one of the longest-running CG news organizations in the world. Our news reporting has gathered a reputation for credibility, independent coverage and focus on quality journalism. Our feature articles are known for their in-depth analyses and impact on the CG scene. “5 out of 5 artists recommend it.”
knowing someone who worked at Asylum I was told it all ended rather shabbily. in typical fashion the people at the top crapped over the people at the bottom, made sure all the work was completed then turned around and told the staff they wouldn`t be paid for it.
this is very common these days and i think its time it was made an offence myself. its fraud.
According to a report from Variety: “McGuinness expressed his regret that artists will be left unpaid for their final week’s work.”
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118027742
There’s much praise around for Nathan McGuinness’ work at Asylum, including from ppl who worked there. He does not seem at all like someone who would enjoy being in such a situation, or who wouldn’t do the best he could for artists at his facility.
Check out this comment by Scott Ross, presumably the founder of Digital Domain:
http://www.fxguide.com/qt/3161/asylum-visual-effects-closing/comment-page-1#comment-13850
It seems like this is one of those regrettable situations where no one ends up winning.
Could the company sign over a license seats to a employee that didn’t get paid? Or a computer, aeron chair? Would be better then nothing.
Agreed. That would at least be some compensation.