CGPress uses technology like cookies to analyse the number of visitors to our site and how it is navigated. We DO NOT sell or profit from your data beyond displaying inconspicuous adverts relevant to CG artists. It'd really help us out if you could accept the cookies, but of course we appreciate your choice not to share data.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Funny ! I just yesterday started to play with the idea to develop such a tool implemented directly inside 3ds Max. I then read up about to Google Licensing terms, and learned that if the software which downloads Google Street View data is SOLD (=costs money), the developer/seller has to buy into a plan for Google Street View. This is what i get from this Google Maps pricing page: https://developers.google.com/maps/pricing-and-plans/
This stopped me from really starting to go further. So the question arises:
Does Panorama Extractor adhere to those licensing terms, did i understand something wrong regarding the licensing terms or is Panorama Extractor in a grey area here ?